You've been doing the work.
Now someone is asking you to prove it.

Most organizations have no defensible record of their accessibility work

Scanners detect issues. Spreadsheets track them loosely. Email threads document decisions that no one can find later. When legal scrutiny arrives, organizations discover that years of genuine effort left behind nothing a court or regulator will credit. The work happened. The record does not exist.

Large-scale analyses of over one million websites consistently find that most fail basic accessibility checks. ADA-related digital accessibility lawsuits now exceed 4,000 cases per year in federal court alone, with thousands more in state courts and demand letters. Regulatory requirements are expanding across jurisdictions. The question is no longer whether your organization will face scrutiny, but whether you can produce evidence when it arrives.

Automated scans capture only a fraction of issues and document none of the response

Industry research shows automated tools detect only a portion of accessibility barriers. They do not show who was responsible for each issue, what remediation steps were taken, who reviewed the evidence, or whether the same issue was detected and ignored six months earlier. Under legal examination, a scan report without a governance record demonstrates activity, not accountability. Plaintiff counsel knows this. Your organization should too.

• Scans produce snapshots. Courts need timelines.
• Detection is not the same as documented response.
• An unremediated finding with no record is worse than no scan at all.

A chain of institutional accountability, not just a log of findings

SiteRecord records every step: when an issue was detected, who acknowledged it, who was assigned responsibility, what evidence of remediation was submitted, who reviewed that evidence, what they decided, and when. Every action is attributed, timestamped, and immutable. The result is a record that can be examined by someone who assumes you are wrong and is looking for gaps - and holds up anyway.

• Immutable finding and evidence records
• Full attribution chain from detection to resolution
• Separation of duties between evidence submission and review
• Cryptographic integrity verification

You are competing with the absence of a system

SiteRecord is not competing with other accessibility tools. It is replacing the spreadsheets, disconnected audit reports, and email threads that most organizations currently rely on. If you have received an ADA demand letter, operate under Section 508 obligations, or work with legal counsel on accessibility compliance, you already know what is missing. SiteRecord is what fills that gap.